曾文振缺席 七選區政見會 雙人對槓
[記者郭顏慧／新北報導]
新北市第七選區昨晚在板橋沙崙國小舉行政見發表會，無黨籍候選人曾文振疑涉賄選被收押，僅國、民兩黨候選人出席，同一時間，曾文振支持者也在會場附近車隊掃街拜票，表達參選到底決心。
新北市第七選區這次有民進黨羅致政、國民黨江惠貞和無黨籍曾文振三人角逐立委席次，無黨籍候選人曾文振疑因涉賄選，上週被收押禁見，無法出席政見會，昨天會場預留給曾文振支持者聆聽政見的區域空空蕩蕩，和其他兩黨候選人數十名支持者到場相挺的熱鬧場面相比，有極大落差。
Dr. Lo 發表在
痞客邦
留言(2)
人氣()
2號旗寫特赦扁 羅致政：不是我
[記者游明煌／板橋報導]
人民最大黨在新北市板橋區懸掛的競選旗幟，被民進黨立委候選人羅致政競選總部認為，只寫2號及標榜特赦阿扁，易讓支持者誤以為是羅致政的主張，控告插旗工人涉嫌違反選罷法，但已撤告。人民最大黨則表示，因旗幟都不見了，如果要不回來，不排除反告對方涉嫌違反選罷法，將再溝通。
警方調查，去年12月27日，新北市板橋區立委候選人羅致政競選總部，發現中山路懸掛競選旗幟旁都另外又掛了另一面旗幟，有的甚至綁在一起，上面寫著和羅致政一樣「2號」，又寫著「人民最大」、「特赦阿扁」等主張。
Dr. Lo 發表在
痞客邦
留言(1)
人氣()
立委選舉／江惠貞數政績 羅致政給承諾
[記者游明煌／板橋報導]
新北市立委選舉第七選區公辦政見發表會昨晚登場，國民黨候選人江惠貞、民進黨候選人羅致政到場各抒己見，支持人馬各據一方加油，無黨籍候選人曾文振因涉及賄選被羈押缺席，台下沒出現穿著他背心的支持人馬，一片空蕩蕩。
Dr. Lo 發表在
痞客邦
留言(5)
人氣()
3Ｄ投影 羅致政「分身」演講
[記者林金池／新北市報導]
新北市第七選區民進黨立委候選人羅致政，選戰開打後四處掃市場、站橋頭，礙於分身乏術，使用新型３Ｄ投影機，將影片投射在專用膠膜上，猶如真人發表演說，另類「分身」吸引許多選民注意，新奇有趣又能傳達政見。羅致政表示，第一眼看到這台機器就覺得新奇不已，當下就決定拍攝影片，將３Ｄ技術運用在選戰中，沒想到竟然引起大家的注意，而且影片可以拍攝不同的內容，一直重複播出。
他說，傳統掃市場、站橋頭選戰方式讓人分身乏術，新發明解決了這個問題，採取背投影方式的投影機器，將影片投射到專用膠膜上，讓影像如真人一樣站立在街頭，影像會動會說話，白天晚上也能夠使用，這樣的發明，讓過路民眾嘖嘖稱奇。
站在３Ｄ投影機旁，無論身高、體型都和本人一樣，從遠方看還真的分不出誰是本尊誰是分身？這種投影方式不僅可以運用在造勢場合，甚至在鬧區、捷運入口處，都可以看到羅致政的分身，成為選戰有趣的焦點。
本文轉引自中國時報
https://news.chinatimes.com/focus/11050105/112012010800804.html
Dr. Lo 發表在
痞客邦
留言(1)
人氣()
蔡訪板橋區農會 理事長力挺
[記者郭顏慧／新北報導]
民進黨總統候選人蔡英文昨天在新北市第七選區黨籍立委候選人羅致政陪同下，拜會無黨籍新北市議員廖裕德和板橋區農會理事長郭進源等人，獲得郭進源公開力挺。由於農會向來被視為親藍體系，蔡英文此行拔樁意味濃厚。
蔡英文昨天下午在新北市車隊掃街，晚間到三重區參加造勢晚會，利用短暫空檔時間，蔡英文在羅致政陪同下，前往板橋拜會無黨籍新北市議員廖裕德及板橋區農會理事長郭進源、總幹事王雪慧和板橋郭氏宗親會理事長郭耀元等人。
Dr. Lo 發表在
痞客邦
留言(0)
人氣()
新北／羅致政造勢 蔡英文站台
[記者王長鼎／板橋報導]
民進黨立委候選人羅致政昨天在板橋區浮洲運動公園舉辦演講會，總統候選人蔡英文前往造勢，以總統、立委及政黨選舉號碼，帶領現場約1500名支持者高呼「123護台灣」口號。
昨天是2011年最後一天，蔡英文一上台就先祝大家「新年快樂」，並表示希望從今年的第一天開始，大家都很快樂，共同迎接快樂的一年，讓2012年有一個全新的開始。
Dr. Lo 發表在
痞客邦
留言(0)
人氣()
2012 ELECTIONS: Ma ambiguous, flip-flops on cross-strait issues: DPP
[ Chris Wang and Mo Yan-chih / Staff Reporters]
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has been ambiguous and has constantly flip-flopped on his position on the unification of Taiwan and China, and he intends to change rather than maintain the “status quo,” the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) said yesterday.
Ma, who is seeking re-election next month, has failed to speak out on many issues, including his position on unification, signing a peace agreement with China with the prerequisite of a referendum and his Taiwanese-Chinese identity, among others, making his honesty highly questionable, DPP legislative candidate Lo Chih-cheng (羅致政) and former DPP legislator Julian Kuo (郭正亮) told a press conference in Taipei.
Ma has publicly stated his goal of unification at least eight times since 2005, but he has denied those comments whenever he has been challenged, Lo said, adding that Ma has also backed out of his pledge to make a referendum the prerequisite of a peace accord with China and he has refused to amend the Referendum Act (公民投票法).
Ma’s “three noes” policy — no unification, no independence and no use of force — which he says is a pledge to maintain the “status quo,” could be interpreted as an attempt to change to the “status quo” because “he does not rule out unification, denies Taiwan’s sovereignty and he has surrendered Taiwan’s self-defense,” Lo said.
The DPP submitted six questions to Ma.
The party asked whether unification is the ultimate goal of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) after the president told Newsweek magazine in an interview published in December 2005 that “unification is the ultimate goal for our party.”
The DPP also questioned what his advocation of “no unification” actually means.
“Does it mean that unification is not an option or does it mean he does not rule out unification as he told the Chinese-language CommonWealth magazine in an interview in January 2009?” Lo asked.
Lo asked Ma whether his initiative to sign a peace agreement with China in 10 years would be based on the Guidelines for National Unification, as his running mate Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) has said, and whether the agreement would function as a prelude to eventual unification.
Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) has said that the guidelines ceased to apply in 2006 and that they have not been reinstated during Ma’s term in office.
Ma appeared to make conflicting comments when he said in a speech at the London School of Economics and Political Science in February 2006 that he would love to “create ideal conditions for unification” and a peace agreement would be a “medium-term goal,” but now he is saying that a peace agreement should be signed in 10 years, Lo said.
While a majority of the international community recognizes that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) represents “China” in the “one China principle,” Kuo said, Ma insists that “China” represents the Republic of China (ROC).
"How are you [Ma] going to deal with the PRC then? Do you intend to eliminate the PRC or to sign a peace accord under which Taiwan is named as part of China?” he asked.
The final question emerged after China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) spokesman Yang Yi (楊毅) said that “Taiwan and China belong to the same country and bilateral relations were not, are not and will not be state-to-state,” Kuo said.
Whether both sides of the Taiwan Strait belong to “one China” — regardless of whether “China” is the PRC or the ROC — is the core issue of the co-called “1992 consensus,” he said, adding that Ma needs to make his position on the issue clear and to fulfill his promise that all major political decisions on cross-strait relations would be determined by Taiwanese.
Kuo said that in terms of his cross-strait policies, People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) has been more honest than Ma, as the former has insisted that both sides of the Taiwan Strait belong to “one China.” Soong has said that Ma should reinstate the Guidelines for National Unification if he agrees with the “one China” principle.
Yesterday’s press conference was the third of its kind hosted by the DPP’s “interpellation group on national affairs,” which was set up to examine Ma’s performance and to raise questions on cross-strait, domestic and foreign affairs, as well as defense policies, until election day on Jan. 14.
In response, Ma’s re-election campaign office spokesman Yin Wei (殷瑋) said Ma would not address the issue of unification during his term in office as he has promised, adding that Ma’s proposed peace agreement with China would only proceed under this premise.
"President Ma has repeated his stance on numerous occasions — that he will not discuss the issue of unification [with China] during his term — that is what ‘no unification’ means. The president has made that very clear,” Yin said.
The “three noes” policy and the “1992 consensus” remain the main principle policies for cross-strait development, while Ma’s proposed cross-strait peace agreement would only be signed with strong domestic support and the supervision of the legislature, Yin said.
"President Ma is candid on the issue of unification. Does Chairperson Tsai dare to be candid about the issue of independence?” Yin asked, accusing Tsai and the DPP of adopting double standards on cross-strait issues, and challenging Tsai to offer clear explanation as to whether her proposed cross-strait peace mechanism is based on the premise of independence for Taiwan.
"Why is it that your [Tsai’s] proposal is a promotion of peace, while other people’s proposed peace agreements sell out Taiwan? This is a clear double standard,” Yin said.
This article is from Taipei Times
https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2011/12/30/2003521959/1
Dr. Lo 發表在
痞客邦
留言(0)
人氣()
板橋立委激戰 江設後援會羅推電視CF
[記者陳冠廷/新北報導]
新北市第7選區立委候選人江惠貞今（28）日成立後埔後援會，並由新北市議員林國春親自出任會長，全力為江惠貞最重要的票源區衝刺；至於同選區的立委候選人羅致政，則推出新一波的電視競選廣告，廣告的訴求為讓我們為下一代投票，讓台灣成為一個充滿幸福、希望的國家。
立委候選人江惠貞後埔後援會長林國春說，從10月起至上週止，共委託中時、聯合兩大報及世新、銘傳等大學所做的5次民調顯示，江惠貞雖然面臨黨內分裂的危機，但仍呈現領先的趨勢，民進黨候選人羅致政緊追其後，政黨對決的形勢儼然形成。
不過，目前雙方的差距逐漸縮小，江惠貞已陷入苦戰，因此呼籲支持者不要浪費手中的選票，團結支持江惠貞守住戰果。
羅致政指出，過去他在大學教書是為培養我們的下一代，現在決定參政則是扛起我們這一代的責任，尤其對人的關懷，以及對這塊土地的期待，是促使他參政的最大動力，這也是我們這一代不可逃避的責任。
羅致政並呼籲所有選民，總統投蔡英文、立委投羅致政，讓民進黨三次政黨輪替，讓蔡英文當選、讓民進黨國會席次過半，讓民進黨完全的執政，這樣台灣的改革才能大步向前走，建立起公平、正義而又充滿幸福、希望的國家。
Dr. Lo 發表在
痞客邦
留言(0)
人氣()
DPP legislative candidates seek reform
‘PROFESSIONALISM’:A group of 19 candidates said they aimed to reinvent the eighth legislature by refusing last--minute bills and closed-door negotiations
Dr. Lo 發表在
痞客邦
留言(0)
人氣()
拚立委／羅致政：選舉為積極實現政見 當選後不入閣
[記者王鼎鈞／新北報導]
長期為民進黨倚重的學者羅致政，投身板橋東區立委選戰，積極展現參政的決心。由於羅致政是蔡英文去年選新北市長時的政策部主任，因此，他要藉由參選，實現尚無法兌現的政見。所以，如果蔡英文選上總統，而他當選立委，不會考慮入閣。
Dr. Lo 發表在
痞客邦
留言(0)
人氣()
金正日死亡 羅致政解析南北韓統一的兩種可能
[記者王鼎鈞/新北報導]
北韓官方電視台報導，領導人金正日已經身亡，分析亞洲政局，南北韓是否可能因此邁向統一？東吳大學政治系副教授羅致政19日表示，南北韓在兩種狀況下可能統一，但可能性不高，所以目前應仍是維持現狀。
羅致政分析，金正日之死傳聞多次，很多人也開始擔心金正日兒子金正恩的接班問題，所以安排金正日妹婿張成澤當「攝政王」，協助接班。過去也傳出，中國和美國各自運用力量在北韓角力，未來北韓是否會藉著挑釁外國勢力，藉以穩固國內情勢，值得關注。
羅致政認為，南北韓只有兩種情況下可能會統一，一是北韓政權垮台、內部走向民主化，走向和平統一，但可性不高；或者北韓被南韓吃掉，可能性存在，但北韓有核武，要付出的代價很高。尤其大國不樂見短期間促成南北韓統一，所以應該仍會維持現狀。
關於北韓領導人身故對台灣的影響，羅致政說，美國在這些年來一直被綁在中東，但從天安艦事件以來，尤其面對亞洲和中國的崛起，讓美國極想重返亞洲；與亞洲各國取得夥伴關係確保經濟地位，也強化軍事力量。
美國會不會藉由金正日死亡，進一步加強部屬在亞洲的軍力、對亞洲的承諾，這影響到美中兩國的關係。對台灣的影響，就取決中美關係變好或變壞，台灣在美中間扮演的角色與態度。
Dr. Lo 發表在
痞客邦
留言(0)
人氣()
The biotech industry needs all of our support
By Lo Chih-cheng 羅致政
Dr. Lo 發表在
痞客邦
留言(0)
人氣()
